This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Denby, D. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Herder: culture, anthropology and the Enlightenment

Dublin City University, david.denby{at}dcu.ie

The anthropological sensibility has often been seen as growing out of opposition to Enlightenment universalism. Johann Gottfried Herder (1744-1803) is often cited as an ancestor of modern cultural relativism, in which cultures exist in the plural. This article argues that Herder’s anthropology, and anthropology generally, are more closely related to Enlightenment thought than is generally considered. Herder certainly attacks Enlightenment abstraction, the arrogance of its Eurocentric historical teleology, and argues the case for a proto-hermeneutical approach which emphasizes embeddedness, horizon, the usefulness of prejudice. His suspicion of the ideology of progress and of associated theories of stadial development leads to a critique of cosmopolitanism and, particularly, of colonialism. But a comparison with a central Enlightenment figure like the natural historian Buffon (1708-88) reveals shared anthropological assumptions: human beings are characterized by the flexibility of their relationship to their environment, and by their ability to transmit and receive social knowledge. Herder’s critique of progress is thus an unstable one: culture [Kultur] as the process through which humanity develops can also be called Enlightenment [Aufklärung]. Herder’s definition of culture is much closer to a unitary Enlightenment model of civilization than is frequently suggested. Herder’s relativism is thus open to question: he holds on to certain universal criteria for transcultural judgements. This reassessment of Herder’s place in Enlightenment anthropology raises questions of contemporary relevance regarding cultural relativism on the one hand, and modernization and globalization on the other.

Key Words: civilization • culture • Enlightenment anthropology • the Enlightenment • progress

History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 18, No. 1, 55-76 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/0952695105051126


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Burges Watson, T. Moreira, and M. Murtagh Little bottles and the promise of probiotics Health (London) , March 1, 2009; 13(2): 219 - 234. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Moreira and P. Palladino Squaring the Curve: The Anatomo-Politics of Ageing, Life and Death Body Society, September 1, 2008; 14(3): 21 - 47. [PDF]

				R. Shields Hope and Fear in Biotechnology: The Space-Times of Regulatory Affect Space and Culture, May 1, 2008; 11(2): 125 - 141. [Abstract] [PDF]