This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cohen-Cole, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The reflexivity of cognitive science: the scientist as model of human nature

The Fishbein Center for the History of Science, The University of Chicago, 1126 E. 59th St., Chicago, IL 60637, USAjamiecc{at}uchicago.edu

This article examines how experimental psychology experienced a revolution as cognitive science replaced behaviorism in the mid-20th century. This transition in the scientific account of human nature involved making normal what had once been normative: borrowing ideas of democratic thinking from political culture and conceptions of good thinking from philosophy of science to describe humans as active, creatively thinking beings, rather than as organisms that simply respond to environmental conditions. Reflexive social and intellectual practices were central to this process as cognitive scientists used anti-positivist philosophy of science simultaneously to justify their own work as valid and also as a model of human thinking. In the process, the normative philosophy of science or ‘good academic thinking’ that cognitive scientists used to reshape the discipline of psychology and characterize themselves became, at the same time, the descriptive model of human nature.

Key Words: behaviorism • cognitive science • philosophy of science • psychology • reflexivity

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?